LS vs Coyote 2, Episode 4: A Winner Crowned In Dramatic Dyno Session

Share
Embed
  • Published on:  Friday, March 29, 2019
  • In a dogfight on Westech's engine dyno, the LS and Coyote engines are dyno tested in a quest for victory in the competition. LS vs. Coyote 2: Boost, is a competition where two teams were given $15,000 budgets, plus ProCharger superchargers, in a quest to make the absolute most horsepower per dollar allowed in a brutal dyno test. Budgets were pushed to the limits in order to win. Top engine builders, LME and MPR, were both were given the platform (LS and Coyote) and a common set of rules to build on - which included VP C85 fuel, up to 12-rib serpentine belts, their choice of any ProCharger, and hydraulic roller camshafts (among other things). These teams were challenged to make the most horsepower possible on a fixed budget. Things got dicey in the room, as both builders tried to push the limits and the rulebook in ways we didn't even imagine.
    View more at: http://www.HorsepowerWars.com

    SUBSCRIBE to the Power Automedia Youtube Channel --http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=powertv
  • Source: https://youtu.be/jzL_4yVuTX4

Comment

  • Florida armed civilian

    Florida armed civilian

     5 months ago +239

    Both engines are badassss... but a 427 vs 302 is not fair!

  • jda41589

    jda41589

     5 months ago +62

    Coyote just inferior, less reliable and needs to rev much higher (why belt kept slipping) to make less power. Not to mention the whole timing chain design issue.

  • Choche

    Choche

     5 months ago +32

    This is so so so unfair. Please give the LS more valves. That coyote looks like a monster on rabies. Hahaha........bunch of crybabies.

  • Mathieu Boonen

    Mathieu Boonen

     5 months ago +85

    I would like to see a 5.0 litre LS compete in a fairer comparison almost 2 litre difference is hardly fair. Or extrapolate the difference by dividing the LS numbers by 1.4

  • ramnale

    ramnale

     5 months ago +85

    Chevy will always win, Ford can put good numbers but will fail all the time. As a former track employee, I would see mustangs run 1-2 times then break. While the ls motors running all night. No wonder there’s an ls motor on almost anything, even mustangs. It’s a thing, ls swaps not coyote swaps

  • Ant B

    Ant B

     5 months ago +6

    Awesome!

  • GOFASTER

    GOFASTER

     5 months ago +42

    "You know where to send that trophy", yeah not to LME for using stock head bolts.

  • FoG Rej3cTz

    FoG Rej3cTz

     5 months ago +7

    As a chevy man i like the coyote cuz it revs higher but the ls is jus a DOG

  • oak 1971 KD9NXQ

    oak 1971 KD9NXQ

     5 months ago +8

    6 bolt mains better flowing heads, just a better design.

  • oak 1971 KD9NXQ

    oak 1971 KD9NXQ

     5 months ago +4

    LS would have lived.

  • oak 1971 KD9NXQ

    oak 1971 KD9NXQ

     5 months ago +11

    So, cheated on the Ford and still poop.

  • sonny day

    sonny day

     5 months ago +61

    Everyone knows the LS was going to win, there's no replacement for displacement.

  • tony mccoy

    tony mccoy

     5 months ago +55

    The engine you used is from an f150 not a mustang 2 different engines one is for high torque low rpm the other high horsepower high rpm or maybe you should use the 5.2 engine or the new 7 liter Ford engine displacement against displacement

  • Damon Rice

    Damon Rice

     5 months ago +34

    I disagree with the results. Both engines should have been closer to same cubes. Ijs. Both are very stout engines and both makes real good power.

  • Houstang

    Houstang

     5 months ago +3

    Incredible.

  • Shrapnel Coated Halo

    Shrapnel Coated Halo

     5 months ago +30

    I dig both motors, but tbh the LS platform is just a better dollar/hp engine.
    That being said, I am pretty happy with the fact that American V8 engines are the best in the world, dollar/hp& reliability wise.
    My only wish is they would have done a Dodge as well.
    They all kick ass.

  • Rob Rich

    Rob Rich

     5 months ago +8

    🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 yall are so full of shit!

  • l l

    l l

     6 months ago +68

    Should have been a 5.3L LS.

  • l l

    l l

     6 months ago +72

    If you're not matching displacement it's not a fair comparison.

  • MtnDew in the RazorBack

    MtnDew in the RazorBack

     6 months ago +39

    LS should've used a 4.8... so the Ford 5.0 would've had a chance